home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: access4.digex.net!not-for-mail
- From: ell@access4.digex.net (Ell)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Why C++ sucks++
- Date: 19 Feb 1996 03:10:51 GMT
- Organization: The Universe
- Message-ID: <4g8pnr$7do@news4.digex.net>
- References: <1996Feb17.181435.1@willow>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: access4.digex.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- ferriom@woods.uml.edu wrote:
- :
- : *** HIGH SCHOOL ***
- :
- : 100 PRINT "Hello World."
- : 999 END
- :...
-
- [example from this the second time you have posted this deleted]
-
- ferriom, how many times does your point, with respect to C++ strings, have
- to be disproven? Agreed, there are many cases where the compiler should
- automagically implement the functionality you elaborate for user defined
- classes. But for strings and many other useful classes, all of the
- functionality you need is in the class libraries that come with most
- C++ compilers. Or, in terms of STL, will come with the compiler.
-
- Elliott
-